The older I get, the more I realize that I need to question my assumptions.
I'm not talking about the fundamentals of faith (though I have learned to live with, and to accept doubt as my shadowy companion).
Rather, I often question the nature of knowing itself.
Fear not, I'm not going all epistemological on you.
Instead, I am learning to question what is proffered, 24/7, as knowledge, via scientific certainties, statistics, studies, and surveys.
A few weeks ago, the Pew Research Center for Religion & Public Life came out with the results of a poll it had done last spring, revealing an apparent growing discrepancy between what Republicans and Democrats think about the scientific theory of evolution (Darwin and all that).
The media, including me, leapt all over it. I solicited comments on my FB page to explain the results. Some saw them as predictable. Others questioned the results. Still others queried the way the poll was done.
Fortunately for me, I got sidetracked, and didn't end up writing about the Pew poll until this past week. By then, experts on statistics had time to take apart the results, and to argue that much of the media frenzy was a tempest in a teapot.
What do you think? Feel free to comment, either here or at wwwlnpnews.com.
http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/945349_Column--Our-evolving-provisional-knowledge.html
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire